We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 20 July 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS GAIN WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 1.18 (2.27%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap ...
Sunday, 19 July 15
BDI GAINED AND CROSSED 1000 MARK THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI gained and crossed 1000 mark after many months this Friday. The BDI was up almost 20 pct and closed 1048 points on 17 July 20 ...
Saturday, 18 July 15
INTERVIEW : FRANZ ESCALANTE, CHIEF OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, MINERA CHINALCO, PERU
We are interested in the technology of Autonomous trucks, the new-generation trucks are not remote controlled, they are truly autonomous - Franz Es ...
Friday, 17 July 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. INCREASES SHARPLY FOR THE WEEK ENDING JULY 11
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.4 million short ...
Friday, 17 July 15
INDONESIAN POWER-STATION COAL SWAPS DECLINE CONTINUES THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The Q3 swap was declined $ ...
|
|
|
Showing 2916 to 2920 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Planning Commission, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
|
| |
| |
|
