We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 05 January 16
THE SHIPPING MARKET IN 2015 AND LOOKING FORWARD - BIMCO
Global economy: menacing clouds in the sky cast a shadow on global economic developments 2015 never really took off, even though the global economi ...
Tuesday, 05 January 16
4200 GAR COAL INDEX FALL TOWARD $27;SLIPPED 28.05% YEAR-TO-DATE
COALspot.com: Average 5000 GAR coal index has not moved in the past week, averaging $40.12 per ton on last Thursday, according to CS (i) Coal Index ...
Monday, 04 January 16
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP REMAIN FLAT OVER CHRISTMAS & NEW YEAR HOLIDAYS
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2016 delivery rose US$ 0.68 (1.64%) per ton month over month.
A commodity swap is ...
Friday, 01 January 16
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q1'16 DELIVERY CLOSED AT $36.75 PER TON
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap delivery Q1 2016 declined month on month but flat week over week.
According to AsiaClear OTC coal swap' ...
Thursday, 31 December 15
COAL PRICES FELL ON WEAK DEMAND
COALspot.com: Q1’ 2016 API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap decline month over month and slightly up week over week.
The Q1’ 2016 ...
|
|
|
Showing 2626 to 2630 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The University of Queensland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Planning Commission, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
