We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 16 May 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS WEAK AND ALL SEGMENTS EXCEPT PANAMAX WERE DOWN
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities decline this week.
The freight market was weak and a ...
Friday, 13 May 16
COAL CARGOES - SOME RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: SWEDISH CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Indonesia continues to be amongst the world’s major exporters of coal, some 426Mt being traded in 2013 mostly to In ...
Friday, 13 May 16
US WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION IS RUNNING 33% BELOW THE SAME PERIOD IN 2015 - EIA
COALspot.com – U.S the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 10.9 million short tons (mm ...
Friday, 13 May 16
DRY BULK SHIPPING MARKET RECOVERY WILL BE A LONG, HARD-FOUGHT BATTLE - HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Anyone who expects a strong rally in dry bulk market rates to end the industry’s downturn will be bitterly disappointed. By contrast – ...
Wednesday, 11 May 16
U.S. FORECAST COAL PRODUCTION IS EXPECTED TO DECLINED BY 150 MMST IN 2016; THE LARGEST DECLINE SINCE 1949 - EIA
COALspot.com: EIA estimates that U.S. coal production in April was 46 million short tons (MMst), a 6 MMst (12%) decrease from the previous month an ...
|
|
|
Showing 2436 to 2440 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- White Energy Company Limited
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
|
| |
| |
|
