We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 04 December 16
U.S. WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT DECLINED 11.9% W/E 26 NOV; UP 1.4% Y/Y, EIA
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.2 million short ton ...
Thursday, 01 December 16
OIL PRICES MAY SEE LITTLE GROWTH BEFORE 2018, FITCH RATINGS SAYS
High inventories and the potential for US shale production to respond quickly to any market tightening mean oil prices may flat line in 2017 before ...
Thursday, 01 December 16
CHINA 2017 OIL, GAS OUTPUT DROP MAY WORSEN ON CAPEX CUT: FITCH
China's oil and gas production may shrink even more in 2017 than in 2016 after the country's leading oil companies cut exploration and prod ...
Thursday, 01 December 16
ANOTHER WONDERFUL WEEK FOR PANAMAX - FEARNLEY
Supramax
A slower start to the week in the Pacific compared to last Trips from N. China to S. China is paying in the range of low USD 5k, while I ...
Tuesday, 29 November 16
AUSTRALIA'S PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 13.08 MT OF COAL IN OCTOBER; DOWN 10.39% M/M
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port has shipped $AU1,124.7 Mi ...
|
|
|
Showing 2196 to 2200 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
