We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 19 July 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - NASSOS SOULAKIS
Referring back to a previous Intermodal insight that was written in the first quarter of 2017, the author at the time had claimed that MR tanker ra ...
Tuesday, 18 July 17
CHINA'S ECONOMY HAS BOOSTED OPTIMISM IN THE MARKET - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
COALspot.com: China’s economy has boosted optimism in the market as its recently announced GDP growth for the second quarter of the year exce ...
Friday, 14 July 17
IMPORTED COAL IS STILL A SAFE AND RELIABLE SOURCE OF ENERGY IN GERMANY - VDKI
COALspot.com: Imported coal is still a safe and reliable source of energy in Germany. World coal mining has reached a high plateau, but not yet a t ...
Friday, 14 July 17
U.S. WEEKLY COAL-OUTPUT IN SIGNIFICANT DECLINE, EIA FIGURES SHOW
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totaled an estimated 13.4 million short tonn ...
Thursday, 13 July 17
BELT AND ROAD SHIPPING INDICES OFFICIALLY RELEASED - XINHUA
COALspot.com: The Shanghai Shipping Exchange (SSE) Tuesday officially launched the Belt and Road shipping indices to track freight trade data among ...
|
|
|
Showing 2001 to 2005 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Australian Coal Association
- The University of Queensland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PTC India Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|