We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 13 December 17
REFINED COAL HAS MADE UP NEARLY ONE-FIFTH OF COAL-FIRED POWER GENERATION SO FAR IN 2017 - EIA
The U.S. power sector consumption of coal is increasingly shifting to refined coal, even as coal-fired electricity generation decreases. Use of ref ...
Wednesday, 13 December 17
DEMAND FOR THERMAL COAL LOOKED RELATIVELY ROBUST - DANIEL HYNES
Coal prices were a touch higher. Demand for thermal coal looked relatively robust, after reports continued to surface that Chinese authorities have ...
Wednesday, 13 December 17
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE PANAGOPOULOS
As another year is coming to an end and much has been already written about the positive reversal in the dry bulk market, we think it is interestin ...
Monday, 11 December 17
INDIA CONSUMERS ARE SAID TO BE DESPERATELY SEEKING CARGOES - DANIEL HYNES
Coal markets were stronger, as strong demand outside China continues to spur buying said Daniel Hynes, Senior Commodity Strategist at ANZ.
Acc ...
Monday, 11 December 17
CAPESIZE FFA MARKET LOOKING PROMISING MOVING FORWARD - FIS
Capesize
Another very promising day for the big ships as rates continued to firm in both oceans and the paper market ate into the backwardation s ...
|
|
|
Showing 1851 to 1855 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The University of Queensland
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
|
| |
| |
|
