We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 18 April 18
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - STELIOS KOLLINTZAS
The return of traders and charterers from the Easter festivities came along with a slight increase in activity across the edible oil markets. Howev ...
Monday, 16 April 18
MINISTER IGNASIUS JONAN SPEAKS HIS MIND AT INDONESIA MINER - IAN WOLLFF
The Minister for Energy and Mineral resources, Ignasius Jonan, delivered a key note address at the Indonesia Miner conference in Jakarta on the 11 ...
Thursday, 12 April 18
THE PERFECT STORM FOR THE BIG SHIPS - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The perfect storm for the big ships: with holidays, force majeure in two ore exporting ports and bad weather undermining the market. A l ...
Thursday, 12 April 18
SHIPPING CAN MANAGE US-CHINA TARIFFS, BUT RISKS RISING - FITCH
Container and, to some extent, dry bulk would probably be the shipping segments most affected by the recently announced US and China tariffs, Fitch ...
Thursday, 12 April 18
SUPRAS HAVE FIXED MID $11K FOR AN INDO RV TO S. CHINA DELIVERY PHILIPPINES - FEARNLEYS
Supramax
Slow week with little light for improving rates. ECSA to Far East still around $15k + bb and same to Med ca $14k, says Fearnleys in its ...
|
|
|
Showing 1741 to 1745 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- White Energy Company Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
|
| |
| |
|
