We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 28 May 18
KOMIPO ISSUED ANOTHER TENDER FOR 130K MT OF 5700 NAR COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued a tender for 130,000 mt of min. 5700 NAR coal of Australian origi ...
Thursday, 24 May 18
SUPRAS FIXING AROUND USD 15000 FOR INDO TO CHINA COAL TRIPS - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
Both the physical and the paper market have dropped sharply the last couple of days on the back of a lack of fresh cargoes and a growing ...
Thursday, 24 May 18
FITCH: FALLING COAL INVESTMENT TO SUPPORT ASIAN PRICES
Press Release: The long-term outlook for the Asian thermal coal prices is improving, amid rising regional demand and falling mining investment, whi ...
Thursday, 24 May 18
BEIJING ORDERS UTILITIES, MINERS TO HELP COOL RED-HOT COAL MARKET: SOURCES - REUTERS
China’s state planner ordered utilities this week to stop stockpiling thermal coal and told miners to slash prices, two sources familiar with ...
Wednesday, 23 May 18
TANKER MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In the last six months we have seen more than 110 reported tanker transactions involving tonnage larger than 32k dwt and younger than 18 years old. ...
|
|
|
Showing 1716 to 1720 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Coal Association
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
