We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 15 July 20
CHINA'S JUNE COAL IMPORTS FALL 6.7% Y/Y ON PORT CURBS - REUTERS
China’s coal imports dropped 6.7% in June from the same period last year, as stringent import restrictions at ports impeded purchases by trad ...
Wednesday, 15 July 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The Covid-19 virus spread around the world has obviously impacted the global oil demand while the situation remains fluid. The overall constraint ...
Tuesday, 14 July 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.75 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 126.01 points Monday, up 0.75 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Tuesday, 14 July 20
TURKEY - A CASE OF UNDECLARED BUNKER - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Undeclared/excess bunkers can be considered a criminal act by Turkish customs officials with the ship's crew being ac ...
Monday, 13 July 20
PANAMAX: A TUMULTUOUS WEEK IN THE PANAMAX MARKET ENSURED ALL MARKETS GAINED VALUE ON THE WEEK - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
This week witnessed the dreaded correction in the Capesize market, with the time charter average shedding almost 18 per cent to close ...
|
|
|
Showing 871 to 875 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The University of Queensland
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- White Energy Company Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|