We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 21 August 20
BHP COMMITS TO SELLING ITS THERMAL COALMINES WITHIN TWO YEARS - THE GUARDIAN
Move follows pressure from investors but company stops short of full exit from coalmining
BHP has announced it plans to sell off its ...
Thursday, 20 August 20
MINER BHP CONFIRMS PLANS TO EXIT THERMAL COAL SECTOR - THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
The head of mining giant BHP has laid out plans for a reshaping of its global operations by seeking to quit thermal coal mining, offload some cokin ...
Thursday, 20 August 20
LONDON RETAINS ARBITER CROWN - BALTIC EXCHANGE | HFW
Fears that the UK’s decision to leave the European Union would dent the reputation of the nation’s capital as the leader in maritime ar ...
Wednesday, 19 August 20
U.S. COAL STOCKPILES STEADILY INCREASE AFTER REACHING LOWEST LEVEL IN A DECADE IN 2019 - EIA
After reaching their lowest level in more than a decade in March 2019, U.S. coal stockpiles steadily increased to 152 million tons in April 2020, r ...
Wednesday, 19 August 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.26 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 124.92 points Monday, down 0.26 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
|
|
|
Showing 821 to 825 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
