We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 17 December 20
CHINA'S BAN IS LESS OF A THREAT TO AUSTRALIA'S COAL INDUSTRY THAN INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE AMBITION - IEEFA
Australian coal exporters will survive this near-term political fight but there are longterm structural headwinds
The decision by Ch ...
Thursday, 17 December 20
BUMA SIGNED US$1.0 BILLION WORTH OF EXTENSION CONTRACT WITH BERAU COAL
PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama, subsidiary of PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk., has extended its mining services contracts with PT Berau Coal, in relation ...
Wednesday, 16 December 20
INDONESIA 2020 COAL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATED AT 140-145 MLN TONNES - OFFICIAL, REUTERS REPORTED
Indonesia’s domestic coal consumption is estimated at 140-145 million tonnes this year, Dodik Ariyanto, an official at the energy ministry, t ...
Wednesday, 16 December 20
RUSSIA REVISES DOWN EXPORT EXPECTATION - FITCH
The Ministry of Economy of Russia, the world’s third largest thermal coal exporting country, released its annual forecasts ...
Wednesday, 16 December 20
INDIAN COAL IMPORTS TO REMAIN SUBDUED - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Rating commented on Indian Coal Imports, Fitch said, coal imports by Indian utilities fell by about 24% yoy to 44 million tonnes (mt) i ...
|
|
|
Showing 701 to 705 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The University of Queensland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PTC India Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
