We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 13 February 09
INDONESIA IS EXPECTED TO PRODUCE 225 MILLION TONES OF COAL IN 2009 - ENERGY MINISTRY
Indonesia, the world's top thermal coal exporter, will allocate 68.3 million tonnes of coal out of expected forecast production of 225 million ton ...
Friday, 06 February 09
INDONESIA'S COAL PORTS HAVE FORCED A RETHINK ON 'TRADITIONAL' HANDLING OPTIONS
Port Strategy reported that, Indonesia’s main coal-producing islands of Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Sumatra suffer from a scarcity of suitable la ...
Thursday, 22 January 09
MINISTER: MINING LAW PROHIBITS RAW MATERIAL EXPORT - ESDM
The Coal and Mining Law, approved during the House of Representatives plenary meeting on December 16, 2008 seeks to domestically increase mining com ...
Wednesday, 07 January 09
SOUTH KALIMANTAN COAL PRODUCTION EXPECTED TO INCREASE - ESDM
Coal production from the South Kalimantan region has the potential to increase in the next few years. Aside from the vast proven reserves of coal, s ...
Tuesday, 30 November 99
GLENCORE EXPECTS 2023 TRADING UNIT PROFITS OF UP TO $4 BLN - REUTERS
Glencore GLEN.L on Friday said it expects profits at its trading division this year of up to $4 billion, exceeding its long-term annual guidance.
...
|
|
|
Showing 6866 to 6870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
|
| |
| |
|
