We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 16 March 09
COAL MINER BUKIT ASAM RECORDS 135% GAIN IN NET PROFIT FOR 2008 - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
Indonesia's state-owned coal miner PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam Tbk said its net profit jumped 135 percent last year, having sold more coal at hi ...
Saturday, 14 March 09
NATIONAL ALUMINIUM TO IMPORT COAL NEXT MONTH TO EASE SHORTAGE - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, National Aluminium Co., India’s biggest alumina maker, plans to import as much as 150,000 metric tons of coal next mo ...
Friday, 13 March 09
VIETNAM APPROVES TWO COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS TO MEET DEMAND -THANHNIENNEWS
Thanhnien News reported that, The government has approved a proposal to build two 2,400-megawatt coal-fired power plants in the provinces of Nam Din ...
Friday, 13 March 09
INDONESIAN STATE-RUN COMPANIES PROFIT MAY FALL 10% THIS YEAR -THANHNIENNEWS
Tanhnien news reported that, Indonesian state-run companies’ profits may fall about 10 percent this year as commodity prices decline, cutting ...
Thursday, 12 March 09
INDONESIA'S CIREBON ELEC IN TALKS ON COAL SUPPLIES - REUTERS
Reuters reported that, Indonesia's PT Cirebon Electric Power, an independent power producer, is in talks with a number of coal suppliers to seek a ...
|
|
|
Showing 6841 to 6845 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
