We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 April 09
INDONESIAN GOVT SAYS COAL MINES CAUSE WEEKLONG FLOOD - THE JAKARTA POST
Samarinda administration in East Kalimantan admitted openly Thursday that the weeklong flood that paralyzed the city was caused by unruly management ...
Saturday, 25 April 09
FOREIGN SHARE DIVESTMENT STARTING THE 6TH YEAR OF PRODUCTION - MAJALAH TAMBANG
The government would set a divestment scheme for foreign miners, which would require companies to divest their ownership starting the 6th year of pr ...
Saturday, 25 April 09
INDO TAMBANGRAYA MEGAH ALLOCATED USD 126 MILLION FOR CAPITAL SPENDING - MAJALAH TAMBANG
Somyot Ruchirawat, President Director of PT Indo Tambangraya Megah, Tbk (ITMG), has announced the company's total dividend payment of Rp 1,345 per ...
Saturday, 25 April 09
MINING SECTOR IS STILL ON THE SURPLUS - THE JAKARTA POST
The global financial crisis is apparently also having an impact on the mining sector. People are thinking twice about investing in the mining sector ...
Saturday, 25 April 09
ADARO RUNS CATARACT OPERATION PROGRAM - THE JAKARTA POST
As part of its CSR program, thermal coal producer PT Adaro Indonesia has made cataract operations available to residents of Tandjung district, South ...
|
|
|
Showing 6791 to 6795 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
