We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 12 May 09
BANPU'S PROFIT DOUBLES TO RECORD AFTER SALES JUMP - BLOOMBERG
BANPU Pcl, Thailand’s biggest coal producer, reported first-quarter profit more than doubled to a record after higher prices for the fuel boos ...
Tuesday, 12 May 09
COAL IN PLACE, GMR PLANS 2,000-MW THERMAL PLANT - BUSINESS-STANDARD
GMR ENERGY, a subsidiary of Bangalore-based infrastructure company GMR Infrastructure Ltd, is planning to set up a 2,000-Mw thermal power plant near ...
Monday, 11 May 09
SOUTH AFRICA PROBLEMS SLOW INDIA COAL BUYING - MINE WEB
Indian imports of South African coal are likely to be close to 12 million tonnes in 2009, up from 10 million last year.
Indian coal buyers were a ...
Saturday, 09 May 09
THE WEEK SAW BIT OF HECTIC ACTIVITY IN THE FREIGHT MARKET - VISTAAR SHIPPING
COALspot.com (Singapore) : VISTAAR Shipping Pte Limited, one of the experienced ship operator in Singapore, said, the week saw bit of hectic ac ...
Saturday, 09 May 09
CHINA PLANS TO BUILD COAL STOCKPILE BASES IN SHANDONG - BLOOMBERG
China, the world’s largest coal producer and consumer, plans to build stockpiles of the fuel in the eastern province of Shandong to ensure sup ...
|
|
|
Showing 6761 to 6765 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
|
| |
| |
|
