We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 07 July 09
Q+A - INDONESIA MINING SECTOR FACES ELECTION RISKS - REUTERS
Indonesia has struggled to lure foreign investment to its mining sector in recent years, and the nationalist line on resource exploitation taken by ...
Tuesday, 07 July 09
INDIKA ENERGY COMPLETES THE ACQUISITION OF PETROSEA
TAMBANG reported that, PT Indika Energy, Tbk has officially announced that it has completed the acquisition of PT Petrosea, Tbk. from Clough Interna ...
Tuesday, 07 July 09
RUSSIAN AUDITORS ATTACK COAL EXPORTERS OVER PRICING
Russia's budget is losing substantial revenues because the country's exporters ship coal overseas at artificially low prices through various offsh ...
Tuesday, 07 July 09
RBCT COAL EXPORTS TO REMAIN BELOW CAPACITY IN 2009
Coal volumes railed to South Africa’s Richards Bay Coal Terminal are continuing to fall far short of the corridor’s nameplate yearly cap ...
Tuesday, 07 July 09
TATA POWER AID THE INDONESIAN COAL MINES
BL reported that Mr Prasad Menon MD of TATA Power aid the Indonesian coal mines PT Kaltim Prima Coal and PT Arutmin Indonesia in which TATA Power ha ...
|
|
|
Showing 6621 to 6625 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The University of Queensland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
