We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 16 July 09
JAPAN'S J - POWER STARTS OPS AT NEW 600 MW COAL UNIT
Reuters, a worlds leading news agency reported that, Electric Power Development Co (J-Power) said on Thursday it started commercial operations at it ...
Thursday, 16 July 09
DELIVERY OF COAL MINE EXPLORATION THROUGH NEWCASTLE PORT ROSE 11 PERCENT
July 16th, 2009 Newcastle is a port in Australia that provides services in the delivery of coal from Australia to other countries. Newcastle port ha ...
Thursday, 16 July 09
CIL KEEN ON JOINT VENTURES
* Targets to raise production by 10 m tonnes by 2012
* Plans to tap reserves of abandoned mines
The Hindu, an Indian news paper reported that, t ...
Wednesday, 15 July 09
COAL INDIA INVITES EOI FOR COAL MINING IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES
Economict Tmes reported that, Coal India, a leading PSU with a status of Navratna, today, invited Expression of Interest for selection of strategic ...
Wednesday, 15 July 09
BANGLADESH TO IMPORT COAL FROM INDIA FOR 1 MORE YR
Bangladesh has decided to import coal from neighbour India for another year to save foreign exchange and time, a commerce ministry official said on ...
|
|
|
Showing 6596 to 6600 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Planning Commission, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
