We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 August 09
COAL EXPORTS CONTINUE DESPITE SHORTAGE
Vietnam News reported that, Viet Nam is exporting more coal despite a warning from experts that the country could face a shortage of this fossil fue ...
Monday, 17 August 09
S.KOREA JULY COAL IMPORTS UP TO 8.97 MLN T
* Imports of heating coal in July up 3.7 percent on year
* LNG imports in July fall for seventh straight month
Alibaba reorted that, South Kore ...
Monday, 17 August 09
COAL INDIA PLANS A PRICE HIKE OF 11%
With the state-run CIL mining 84% of the coal produced in the country, an 11% increase will push up inflation by around 0.16%, the company said
L ...
Monday, 17 August 09
BANPU SEES INDONESIAN MINE OUTPUT UP 10 PCT IN 2010
Reuters reported that, Thailand's top coal miner, Banpu, said on Monday it expected coal output from its Indonesian mines to rise 10 percent to abo ...
Monday, 17 August 09
COAL IMPORTS SURGE IN H1
China is one of the world's leading coal producers. But even so, imports of coal have surged in the first half of the year, hitting a record in Jun ...
|
|
|
Showing 6496 to 6500 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PTC India Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
|
| |
| |
|