We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 25 August 09
INDIAN FIRM TO INVEST $44 MN IN INDONESIA
Economic Times - India Times reported that, BEML Limited, India-based second largest heavy equipment producer in Asia, will invest $44 million in In ...
Tuesday, 25 August 09
BHARAT LOOKS TO BULLDOZE RIVALS WITH LOWER PRICES
The Jakarta Globe reported that, The country’s two established heavy equipment suppliers now have a competitor in the form of Indian firm Bhar ...
Tuesday, 25 August 09
PIKE RIVER DELAYS COAL EXPORTS FROM NEW ZEALAND MINE
South African mining Weekly reported that, The first 60,000-t export shipment from ASX-listed Pike River Coal’s new mine has been delayed unti ...
Monday, 24 August 09
INDONESIAN GOVT ASKED TO CONTROL COAL TRADERS, BROKERS
The Jakarta Post, the leading English news paper in Indoneisa reported that, Businesses are urging the government to bring all coal traders and brok ...
Monday, 24 August 09
10,000 MW TO BE GENERATED THROUGH THAR COAL RESERVES BY 2020
Four projects of 2450 MW approved; govt to invest Rs80bn in five years on infrastructure
The News Pakistan reported that, The Thar Coal a ...
|
|
|
Showing 6476 to 6480 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The University of Queensland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
|
| |
| |
|
