We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 04 December 09
JSW ENERGY TO BUY OUT PARENT FIRM'S COAL BLOCK
JSW Energy plans to buy the stake held by JSW Steel in a thermal coal block in Mozambique in an attempt to become an integrated energy company with ...
Thursday, 03 December 09
JAPAN 2010 COAL IMPORTS SEEN FLAT, INDIA'S ROBUST - INDUSTRY
* Japan's demand seen steady in 2010 at 110 mln tonnes
* India's demand seen as robust, at 70 mln tonnes
Reuters reported that, Thermal coal i ...
Thursday, 03 December 09
INDONESIA MAY ALLOW COAL SALES BELOW GOVT PRICE
Reuters reported that, Indonesia is considering giving producers some flexibility to sell coal below the government's monthly benchmark price to co ...
Thursday, 03 December 09
INDONESIA SEEKS TO INCREASE COAL SHIPMENTS TO INDIA, CHINA
Bloomberg reproted that, Indonesia, Asia’s biggest coal exporter, seeks to increase shipments to India and China as the economies improve and ...
Thursday, 03 December 09
COAL INDIA IPO LIKELY TO HIT MARKETS BY NOVEMBER 2010
Soon investors will get to own a slice of India's largest coal mining company. Coal India its initial public offering will hit markets in November ...
|
|
|
Showing 6206 to 6210 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
