We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 11 March 10
THE INDIAN MARKET WAS A BIT QUIET BUT STILL FIRM - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy - Atlantic activity has kept its firm tendency throughout the week for handies, with Atlantic RV´s fixed in the USD.16000 region. With s ...
Thursday, 11 March 10
COAL PRICES SET TO RISE AMID CONFUSION OVER QUARTERLY SYSTEM
Trading room reported that, Coal prices are tipped to rise in coming months amid constrained supply and ongoing Chinese demand, and analysts are con ...
Wednesday, 10 March 10
PROTECTED FORESTS NOW UP FOR GRABS FOR MINING
The Jakarta Post reported that, the government has just issued two new regulations on forests, which could allow protected forests to be used for co ...
Tuesday, 09 March 10
REGULATION NO.23 OF 2010 CONCERNING IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW MINING LAW, PROVIDES MORE CLARITY ON OBTAINING A IUP
COALspot.com: Indonesian government has recently issued another regulation related to Law number 4 of 2009 concerning mineral and coal mining. Two r ...
Tuesday, 09 March 10
MINING LAW OPTIMIZES SECTOR
Law No. 4 / 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining have given a new direction for the future of mining in Indonesia, including Domestic Market Obligation, ...
|
|
|
Showing 5946 to 5950 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Planning Commission, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The University of Queensland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|