We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 25 May 10
BUMPER YEAR PREDICTED FOR INDONESIAN COAL - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta globe reported that, In The country’s coal output may reach 320 million tons this year, up from 300 million tons in 2009, as produ ...
Tuesday, 25 May 10
CHINA'S COAL SHIPMENTS VIA ITS MAIN PORTS RISE BY 13.1 PERCENT IN APRIL
According to the data issued by China's Ministry of Industry and Information on May 21, in April total coal shipments via China's main ports reach ...
Monday, 24 May 10
SAMTAN TO SELL KIDECO TO INDIKA ENERGY?
Insider Stories reported that, Parent company of Indonesia's coal mining contractor PT Petrosea Tbk (PTRO), PT Indika Energy Tbk (INDY) aims to boo ...
Monday, 24 May 10
INDIA'S ESSAR SHIPPING BEGIN COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS OF BULK TERMINAL AT HAZIRA
COALspot.com: Essar Shipping Ports & Logistics Ltd. commences commercial operations of Essar Bulk Terminal at Hazira, one of India's largest dr ...
Monday, 24 May 10
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE (HBA) FOR MAY 2010 REACHES US$ 92.07 PER TON FOB VESSEL
COALspot.com: The directorate general of mineral, coal and geothermal of Indonesia has released Indonesian coal price reference (HBA) for Month of M ...
|
|
|
Showing 5816 to 5820 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PTC India Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
