We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 02 September 10
PLN ASKED TO USE LOCAL COAL
Tempo Interactive reportd that, the Indonesian Mining Association Executive Director, Priyo Pribadi, has called on the state-run electricity company ...
Thursday, 02 September 10
NALCO OPEN TO EQUITY DILUTION IN $3.9 BN PROJECT IN INDONESIA
Business-Standard reported that, state-owned Nalco today said it is considering selling stake in its $3.9 billion (over Rs 18,000 crore) aluminium p ...
Thursday, 02 September 10
DRY BULK MARKET GAINS MOMENTUM TO INCREASE, WITH CHINA ONCE AGAIN TO THE RESCUE
With predictions from Chinese officials stating that the country’s iron ore imports during 2010 could surpass the record amounts of 2009, the ...
Wednesday, 01 September 10
STC BAGS NTPC ORDER TO SHIP 12 MT COAL
My Digital FC reported that, The State Trading Corporation (STC) has bagged NTPC’s tender to ship 12 million tonnes coal from Ind&sh ...
Wednesday, 01 September 10
JAKARTA TO HOST MAJOR INTERNATIONAL MINING EVENT
COALspot.com: (Press Release) In October 2010, the Indonesian Mining Association (IMA) and the Indonesian Coal Mining Association (APBI) will host t ...
|
|
|
Showing 5631 to 5635 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The University of Queensland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
|
| |
| |
|