We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 14 September 10
MID HIGH TEENS FROM WCI, AND HIGH TEENS FROM ECI TO CHINA - BRS
A fairly flat market for the dry bulk segments this week, although the Panamaxes jumped on the back of strong grain exports in the Atlantic. It ...
Tuesday, 14 September 10
HIGH CHARTERING ACTIVITY NEEDS TO KEEP UP FOR DRY BULK RATES TO REMAIN HIGH
Last week’s increase of spot chartering activity pushed dry bulk freight rates to new highs, after a less than lackluster summer. As a result, ...
Monday, 13 September 10
GLENCORE BUYS STAKE IN MINER BUMI
The Jakarta globe reported that, Switzerland-based Glencore International, the world’s largest commodities trader, has quietly acquired a $200 ...
Monday, 13 September 10
IT'S JAI INDONESIA FOR OUR POWER FIRMS
Indian power producers have been compelled to look abroad for fuel to run upcoming facilities, as domestic generation is unlikely to be able to meet ...
Monday, 13 September 10
CIL IN TALKS WITH SHIPPING CORP TO FORM JV FOR COAL IMPORTS
Shipping Corporation of India, the largest domestic shipping liner, may form a joint venture with Coal India for coal imports, a top company officia ...
|
|
|
Showing 5611 to 5615 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- VISA Power Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
