We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 04 January 11
DRY BULK MARKET TO RANGE BETWEEN 1,700 AND 2,600 POINTS IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2011, ANALYSTS SAY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
As we entered 2011, ship owners and analysts, as well as shipbrokers are looking into their “crystal balls” to try to decode the dry bul ...
Monday, 03 January 11
TAXATION FOR COAL MINING COMPANIES IN INDONESIA - A TAX EXPERTS VIEW
COALspot.com - Mrs. Sri Wahyuni Sujono, managing partner of SF Consulting has wrote an exclusive report regarding taxation for coal mining companies ...
Sunday, 02 January 11
JAISWAL TO SEEK COAL MINES IN AFRICA - HINDUSTAN TIMES
Coal Minister Sriprakash Jaiswal will talk with his counterparts in South Africa and Mozambique during his visit from January 5 to secure coal asset ...
Saturday, 01 January 11
COAL PRODUCTION EXPECTED TO EXCEED 340 MILLION TONS THIS YEAR - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, Indonesian coal miners expect to produce 340 million tons of coal in 2011, an increase of 23 percent from 275 millio ...
Friday, 31 December 10
STC TO FINALIZE 12 MILLION MT OF COAL IMPORT CONTRACT TO TWO INDIAN AND A DUBAI BASED COAL TRADER - SOURCES
COALspot.com - World's single largest coal import tender floated by STC on behalf of state utility NTPC to finalize its suppliers or already finali ...
|
|
|
Showing 5456 to 5460 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
|
| |
| |
|
