We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 May 11
THAILAND COAL IMPORTS SURGE IN Q1 - ICAP SHIPPING
Thailand's coal imports leapt 20% in Q1 and the country looks set to import its largest ever volume in 2011 as quoted by ICAP Shipping web site.
...
Monday, 09 May 11
KOSPO SEEKING 65KT STEAMING COAL
COALspot.com - Korea Southern Power Co (KOSPO) issues tender for 65000 Mt of Steaming Coal Supply with a minimum CV of 4,500 kcal/kg on NAR basis. D ...
Monday, 09 May 11
INDONESIA HBA FALL BELOW $118
COALspot.com - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia has set the May 2011 Indonesian Coal Reference Price for thermal coal at US$ 11 ...
Monday, 09 May 11
DIAN SWASTATIKA Q1 PROFIT SOARS 511 PERCENT - INSIDER STORIES
PT Dian Swastatika Sentosa Tbk (DSSA), parent of coal miner PT Golden Energy Mines, reported a 511.73% jump in net profit for the first quarter of t ...
Saturday, 07 May 11
BERAU INKS DEALS WITH CHINESE FIRMS AS COAL WEATHERS COMMODITIES STORM - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, Berau Coal, one of the country’s largest coal miners, has signed sales contracts with two Chinese companies a ...
|
|
|
Showing 5266 to 5270 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|