We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 29 June 11
ANOTHER STRONG PERFORMANCE BY CAPESIZE - BRS
Another strong performance by the Capesize market this week, bringing the BCI up 8% to 1,974 points. However the Panamax market was penalised, losin ...
Monday, 27 June 11
THE IRON ORE IMPORTS BY CHINA SEEMED TO SLOW DOWN - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI was holding as previous week and was just up by 1 point and closed at 1424 points end of last week. The biggest gain was ...
Friday, 24 June 11
THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT WILL NOT EXTEND ALL EXPIRED MINING CONTRACTS - JAKARTA UPDATES
The Indonesian Government have decided not to extend all mining concessions under the scheme called Contract of Work and instead will take over the ...
Friday, 24 June 11
BERAU EYEING 70 PERCENT GROWTH IN EBITDA
Indonesia's coal producer PT Berau Coal Energy Tbk (BRAU) is eyeing a 60 -70 percent growth in EBITDA to US$ 560 million-US$595 million this year. ...
Thursday, 23 June 11
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS EXHIBITING SIGNS OF WEAKNESS THIS WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market seems to be unable to climb at new highs this week, showing signs of weakness, across most ship types. Yesterday, the Baltic Dry ...
|
|
|
Showing 5211 to 5215 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The University of Queensland
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
|
| |
| |
|
