We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 12 July 11
DRY BULK MARKET BEGINS WEEK ON RETREAT MODE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
As was evident by the end of the previous week, the dry bulk market’s growth momentum was about to lose steam, something proven yesterday, whe ...
Monday, 11 July 11
REFLECTIONS ON THE FLEET REACHING ONE BILLION TONNES - CLARKSONS / HELLENIC SHIPPING
“A billion gross tonnes of shipping” has a nice ring to it. It presents the industry as a business of substance, with its 85,000 ships w ...
Sunday, 10 July 11
UNTR PROVIDES US$100 MIO TO TTA - INSIDER STORIES
PT United Tractors Tbk (UNTR) agreed to allocate US$100 million to its coal subsidiary dubbed PT Tuah Turangga Agung (TTA).The US$100 million was pa ...
Sunday, 10 July 11
HARDLY ANY CARGO FROM WC INDIA UNTIL END OF MONSOONS - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI continued to hold last week and firmed up by 27 points with cape and panama index supporting the BDI.
The BDI closed at 1, ...
Sunday, 10 July 11
PTBA INCREASES SHARES IN COAL TRAIN PROJECT - TEMPO INTERACTIVE
TEMPO Interactive reported that, PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam (PTBA) is still studying the plan to buy 20 percent of shares in the PT Bukit Asam T ...
|
|
|
Showing 5196 to 5200 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|