We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 20 July 11
ANTWERP RECEIVES THE CAPESIZE MG COURAGE
The deepening of the Western Scheldt has made the port of Antwerp easily accessible not only to Ultra Large Container Ships of over 10,000 TEU but a ...
Wednesday, 20 July 11
KALIMANTAN GOLD APPOINTS COMMISSIONER TO SUBSIDIARY
Kalimantan Gold Corporation Limited has announced the appointment of Dr. Bambang Setiawan as Commissioner (a senior advisor) to the Board of PT Kali ...
Wednesday, 20 July 11
CHALLENGER GETS TABANG PROJECT IUP PERMIT
COALspot.com - Challenger Deep Resources Corporation has been getting exploration permit or Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) for its Tabang coal in Eas ...
Wednesday, 20 July 11
TCM COAL PROJECT IN SOUTH KALIMANTAN MOVES TO FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDY
COALspot.com - Pan Asia Corporation Ltd has executed a formal agreement with an underground mining group KOPEX to undertake a final feasibilit ...
Wednesday, 20 July 11
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS ON FALLING ON SOFTENING CONDITIONS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market retreated to lower ground on Tuesday, as the industry’s benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) fell to 1,330 points, down b ...
|
|
|
Showing 5181 to 5185 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The University of Queensland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
