We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 09 August 11
DRY BULK MARKET UNABLE TO FIND UPWARD MOMENTUM, SLUMPS AGAIN - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
They same that what goes up must come down and nobody seems to have found a better application of this expression, than the beleguered dry bulk mark ...
Monday, 08 August 11
OIL PRICES ARE SOFTENING, WILL IT INFLUENCE COAL PRICES?
COALspot.com - The current global economic condition is in volatility after a little chance of optimism for economic recovery.
Oil price at ...
Monday, 08 August 11
A SUPRAMAX VESSEL WAS REPORTED FIXED AT $ 12K - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI was slightly up by about 4 points closed at 1268 points which was supported by cape index which was up 3.14 pct and closed at ...
Saturday, 06 August 11
NTPC IS CONSIDERING TO ENTER INTO 25 YEARS COAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Indian, State-run power producer NTPC's present annual consumption is 164 million tonnes, and company is considering long-term agreements abroad to ...
Friday, 05 August 11
RIO TINTO SIGNS MOU WITH JINDAL STEEL AND POWER ON ADVANCING HISMELT TECHNOLOGY
Press Release - Rio Tinto has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Jindal Steel and Power Limited (JSPL) to take the next step in g ...
|
|
|
Showing 5151 to 5155 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
|
| |
| |
|