We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 08 September 11
PETROSEA ADDS US$730 MIO CONTRACT
Coal mining contractor PT Petrosea Tbk (PTRO), a majority owned subsidiary of energy integrated company PT Indika Energy Tbk (INDY), has secured a U ...
Wednesday, 07 September 11
ANOTHER EXCEPTIONALLY STRONG WEEK FOR THE CAPESIZE MARKET - BRS
The very strong rise in Cape rates pushed through an overall improvement in the BDI this week, although relatively little benefit from the Capes has ...
Wednesday, 07 September 11
INDIA HIT BY INDONESIAS COAL PRICE - TEMPO INTERACTIVE
TEMPO Interactive, an Indonesian online news portal reported that, The Indian government has complained about the price increase of Indonesian coal, ...
Wednesday, 07 September 11
SAMPUR POWER AGREEMENT SIGNED - DAILY NEWS
Daily News, Sri Lank's national news paper reported that, the agreement for the setting up of a 500 MW coal-fired power plant at Sampur, Trincomale ...
Tuesday, 06 September 11
INDONESIAS PROPOSED COAL EXPORT BAN MAY HAVE IMPACT ON THE INDIAN POWER SECTOR - DIPESH DIPU
COALspot.com - This is a special interview about Indonesian proposed coal export ban by 2014, with Mr. Dipesh Dipu, Director of Deloitte Touche Tohm ...
|
|
|
Showing 5096 to 5100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|