We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 15 September 11
BOTSWANA COAL AND ENERGY CONFERENCE 2011
Press Release - Botswana Coal and Energy Conference 2011 | 29-30 November 2011 | Gaborone. Botswana represents Africa’s exciting new coal and ...
Thursday, 15 September 11
DRY BULK MARKET EDGING FURTHER UP THE SCALE, CLOSING IN ON 2,000 POINTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market was up once again yesterday, reaching 1,927 points, or 1.375 higher on the day. Thus, it has kept its rising trend established d ...
Wednesday, 14 September 11
INDO STRAITS BAGS 2.4 MILLION TON COAL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT FROM ARUTMIN
COALspot.com - PT Indo Straits Tbk (PTIS) bagged a contract to tranship about 2.40 million tons of coal over an initial period of 6 months fro ...
Wednesday, 14 September 11
DUTA PERTIWI DISCOVERS COAL RESERVE - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, PT Duta Pertiwi Nusantara Tbk (DPNS) yesterday steeply jumped 24.56% to Rp710 a share after the company discove ...
Wednesday, 14 September 11
GOVT SETS SEPTEMBER COAL REFERENCE PRICE AT $116.26 PER TON
COALspot.com - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia has set the September 2011 coal reference price at US$ 116.26 per ton slightly ...
|
|
|
Showing 5081 to 5085 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Planning Commission, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Coal Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
|
| |
| |
|
