We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 23 September 11
UT TO PRODUCE 7 MMT OF COAL BY 2012
PT United Tractors Tbk is targeting a 7 million tons of coal production next year, a 55.55% increase from 4.5 millions targeted this year, said Pres ...
Friday, 23 September 11
RECORD RECYCLING ACTIVITY STIRS OPTIMISM IN DRY BULK SAYS BIMCOS ANALYSIS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
As expected at the start of the year, dry bulk ship owners were expected to flock scrapyards around the world, in order to take advantage of attract ...
Friday, 23 September 11
PANAMAX EXPERIENCED A SOFTENING IN RATES - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
Still a good boost of fresh cargoes entering the market. Vessels in Black Sea with GOA clearance and Baltic positions are fetching tick abov ...
Wednesday, 21 September 11
INDIA'S COAL IMPORTS FROM INDONESIA FALL, CHINA BUYS MORE
COALspot.com - Indian coal imports from Indonesia fall to below 6 million tons in August, and this fall was continuing last few months. Ho ...
Wednesday, 21 September 11
2ND ANNUAL SHALE GAS SUMMIT
2nd Annual Shale Gas Summit 31 October – 3 November 2011 JW Marriott Hotel, Hong Kong
According to a recent EI ...
|
|
|
Showing 5066 to 5070 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
