We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 10 February 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP ADVANCES 3.79% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q2' 2015 rose week over week and month on month.
The Q2 swap up US$ 0.85 (+1.81%) month o ...
Tuesday, 10 February 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS SURGE WEEK OVER WEEK, RAISING HOPES?
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 0.95 per MT (+1.91%) week over week and declined US$ 0.06 (-0.12%) ...
Monday, 09 February 15
AUSTRALIAN COAL PRODUCERS BEST POSITIONED IN OVERSUPPLIED MARKET; US MINES MOST AT RISK - WOOD MACKENZIE
In a 2015 global coal outlook report, Wood Mackenzie says that Australia and Indonesian coal suppliers will see some upside in the difficult months ...
Monday, 09 February 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP GAINS 3.65% TO ONE-MONTH HIGH
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 surge month over month and day on day.
The Q2 swap has soared US$ 2.1 ...
Monday, 09 February 15
Q2' CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP DECLINED 3.28% TO $ 56.92 W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 1.93 (-3.28%) per MT month over month and US$ 0.10 (-0 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3206 to 3210 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PTC India Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Australian Coal Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The University of Queensland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
