We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 05 March 15
BUKIT ASAM BOOKED US$ 1 BILLION REVENUE IN 2014
COALspot.com: Indonesian publicly listed and state owned coal miner PT. Bukit Asam, has announced that, the revenue of the company for the period J ...
Wednesday, 04 March 15
AN AGENDA FOR CHANGE - FITCH INDONESIA CONFERENCE
Fitch Indonesia Conference - 5 March 2015
Fitch Ratings will host its annual Indonesia conference on 5 March 2015.
The theme of this year ...
Wednesday, 04 March 15
KEEP CALM AND INVEST IN DRY - THEODORE NTALAKOS
Keep Calm and Carry On was originally a motivational poster, intended to raise the morale of the British public, produced by the British government ...
Tuesday, 03 March 15
INDONESIAN COAL EXPORT VOLUME TO DECLINE 50% BY 2019
COALspot.com: The Indonesian government is planning to reduce coal export volume by 50% within the next five years while keeping its coal productio ...
Tuesday, 03 March 15
INDIAN THERMAL COAL IMPORTS: STEAMING FORWARD - CLARKSONS
Coal-fired power stations comprise around 60% of India’s power output, and with domestic supply issues and favourable international coal pric ...
|
|
|
Showing 3161 to 3165 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
|
| |
| |
|
