We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at ports in China should be aware of this development. This guidance is aimed at clarifying ship arrest and sale procedure in the Chinese maritime courts which could lead to more frequent vessel arrests in China.
This Insight is a brief commentary on a new judicial interpretation1 issued by China’s Supreme Court. It covers a number of issues relating to ship arrest and the judicial sale of ships (the Interpretation) that came into force on 1 March 2015.
Provision of counter-security for arrest
It is normal practice for a claimant to provide counter-security when arresting in China. Article 76 of the Special Maritime Procedure Law 1999 (SMPL 1999)2 provides that the amount of counter-security should be equivalent to the probable loss the arrest would cause to the party whose vessel is arrested. Over the years, the practice of the Chinese maritime courts has varied depending on the facts of the case and different approaches by individual judges. In some cases, the counter-security amount was equivalent to 30 days’ hire of the vessel, whilst in others an amount equal to the claim in respect of which the vessel was arrested.
The Interpretation sets out in Article 5 a mechanism to calculate the security amount based on the aggregate of:
- the maintenance expenses of the vessel during the period of arrest
- the loss of use resulting from the arrest
- the cost to the party whose vessel had been arrested (the respondent) to provide security to release the vessel.
This is the same formula used for assessing the losses resulting from wrongful arrest, as set out in Article 24 of the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation of 2003 relating to application of the SMPL 1999.3
A number of factors remain unclear, however, such as:
- the level of maintenance to be carried out during the arrest period
- the applicable rate of hire while under arrest
- the scope of security costs – in practice, the maritime courts have generally only included the commission payable by the respondent to provide a bank guarantee.
Furthermore, at the time the arrest application is made – and counter-security is assessed – the respondent will not have an opportunity to substantiate or challenge the evidence submitted relating to maintenance, hire and security costs. That said, once counter security has been provided following the vessel’s arrest, the owners may apply for the amount of security to be increased in the event it can be shown that the original amount is insufficient to cover the owners’ likely losses if the arrest proves wrongful.
Although Article 5 still leaves some open questions, at least it sets out a formula to be followed.
A further clarification relating to counter-security is set out in Article 4. This provides that the maritime courts have a discretion not to request counter-security if the arrest relates to a claim for personal injury at sea or a claim arising under a crew service contract.
Multiple arrests of the same vessel
Article 2 of the Interpretation allows multiple claimants to arrest the same vessel as security for their respective claims. Further, if a claimant has made an arrest application but not applied for a judicial sale, then any subsequent claimant making an arrest application may apply for judicial sale of the vessel according to Article 28 of SMPL 1999.
The Interpretation does not, however, tackle the issue of whether each claimant having arrested the vessel must provide counter-security to the full extent of their respective claims.
Judicial sale and procedure
There are several provisions relating to the judicial sale of vessels:
- Article 11 provides that the judicial sale of a vessel is to be organized by a ship auction committee (comprising judges, auctioneers and surveyors, normally three or five persons, as per Article 34 SMPL 1999)
- Article 13 states that in the event of two failed judicial auctions, the sale price of a ship can be reduced – but not to less than 50 per cent of its assessed value
- Article 14 provides that if a ship has still not been sold after a price reduction, the court may lower the price below 50 per cent of its assessed value provided consent is given by creditors representing two thirds or more of the registered creditors’ claims. In the event a sale is still unsuccessful, the court may release the vessel from arrest
- Article 16 requires creditors to register their claims within 60 days after the court’s announcement for the first judicial auction.
Release of counter-security
The practice of the Chinese maritime courts relating to release or return of counter-security has been a concern for claimants in the past. Counter-security could be held up to two years after the claim had been settled on the basis that it represented security for a possible, subsequent wrongful arrest claim brought by the respondent.
Article 6 of the Interpretation will no doubt be welcomed by claimants. It provides that counter-security should be returned to the claimant forthwith:
- if the respondent agrees, or
- if the claimant requests its return, supported by a valid judicial instrument affirming that the respondent is liable for the claim and the awarded amount is approximately equivalent to the amount of security.
In addition, when a claim has been finally concluded, the claimant can apply to the maritime court for return of the security. The court will notify the respondent and allow them to bring any wrongful arrest claim within 30 days, failing which the security will be returned to the claimant.
Arrest and judicial sale of bareboat chartered vessels
Article 23 of SMPL 1999 allows a claimant to apply to arrest a vessel where its bareboat charterer may be liable for a maritime claim and the ship is under bareboat charter at the time of arrest. However, it has not been clear whether the claimant could apply for judicial sale of the vessel following the arrest.
This is now resolved by Article 3 of the Interpretation, which provides that the claimant is entitled to apply (under Article 29 SMPL 1999) for a judicial sale of the vessel to recover a maritime claim for which the bareboat charterer is liable.
This provision is likely to expose head owners to the possibility of their vessel being subjected to a judicial sale through no fault of their own. This might be of significant interest to a shipowner who finances a bareboat charterer to purchase a vessel.
Miscellaneous
Article 7 provides that the shipowner or bareboat charterer is to remain in charge of management of the vessel while under arrest. Should they fail to do so, the maritime court may appoint the claimant or a third party to manage the ship. In which case, the management costs are to be borne by the shipowner or bareboat charterer, or to be paid out of the proceeds of a judicial sale of the vessel.
Under Article 9, the maritime court must terminate the arrest order in the event that it is impossible to enforce the arrest for “objective reasons”. It has not been defined what amounts to “objective reasons”. One possibility could be that the vessel is no longer within the jurisdiction of the Chinese maritime courts, another that the vessel has become a total loss.
The Interpretation should result in a more common approach to arrest and judicial sale by the Chinese maritime courts. However, some issues arising under the SMPL 1999 remain to be resolved, such as whether insolvency of an owner of an arrested ship should take priority over a maritime lien. Nevertheless it is expected that this Interpretation will be generally welcomed by the maritime courts and parties involved in maritime claims.
Acknowledgement: Thanks to Wang Jing & Co for use of their in-house English translation of the Interpretation, in which further details of the changes can found.
Questions or comments concerning this Gard Insight article can be e-mailed to the Gard Editorial Team.
Source: Gard | Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 March 15
RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS DROP $ 3.65 - 4.0/T W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 declined month over month and week on week.
The Q2 swap has fell US$ ...
Wednesday, 11 March 15
DRY BULK MARKET CLOSED OFF ON THE GREEN FOR A SECOND WEEK IN A ROW - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market closed off on the green for a second week in a row, while the performance of Capesizes hindered a more substantia ...
Wednesday, 11 March 15
MARKET INSIGHT : NEWBUILDINGS - PANOS TSILINGIRIS
From a cost-based, buy-low perspective, there is currently a buying opportunity in the second-hand dry bulk market. I am an anti-cyclical (buy-low) ...
Wednesday, 11 March 15
DRY BULK MARKET: ALL IS NOT LOST FOR A RECOVERY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The low cost of commodities across the board could trigger an increase of trade among many countries, which in turn could lead to a recovery of the ...
Wednesday, 11 March 15
U.S. ELECTRIC GENERATING COMPANIES TO ADD MORE THAN 20 GW OF GENERATING CAPACITY IN 2015; 16 GW OF GENERATING CAPACITY IS EXPECTED TO RETIRE IN 2015
COALspot.com: In 2015, electric generating companies in U.S. expect to add more than 20 gigawatts (GW) of utility-scale generating capacity to the ...
|
|
|
Showing 3146 to 3150 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- White Energy Company Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
