We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 25 January 15
PANAMAX FREIGHT RATES STILL FALLING
COALspot.com: The BDI was slightly down this week to 720 points. The BDI lost 2.83 pct week on week.
The cape index continued its upward trend ...
Friday, 23 January 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION FOR WEEK ENDING JAN. 17 UP 2.5%
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.4 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 22 January 15
PANAMAX: A SOFTER TONE AND OVERALL A SLUGGISH MARKET - FEARNLEYS
Handy
The handy and supra market has experienced yet another week with slow activity and softening rates in both hemispheres, broker Fearnleys AS ...
Thursday, 22 January 15
BUMI RESOURCES POSTS NET INCOME OF $13.3 MILLION 9M-2014
COALspot.com: Bumi Resources, Indonesia’s largest coal miner, reported today that, the company has recorded a net income of $13.3 million for ...
Wednesday, 21 January 15
PANAMAX MARKET MOVED SIDEWAYS OVERALL LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The positive sentiment in which the week prior ended carried on through-out last week as well, the end of which marked the first posi ...
|
|
|
Showing 3236 to 3240 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
