We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 04 February 15
MARKET INSIGHT - LINOS KOGEVINAS
It has been just about over 2 months since, in a move that surprised many and caused widespread apprehension, OPEC decided to maintain its producti ...
Tuesday, 03 February 15
Q1'15 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED $ 3.29 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q4'15 DELIVERY PRICE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for delivery Q1' 2015 rose week over week and month on month.
The Q1 swap up US$ 0.68 (+1.41%) month o ...
Tuesday, 03 February 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q4 DELIVERY CLOSED 5.86% LOWER THAN Q1 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 0.26 per MT (+0.51%) week over week and declined US$ 0.02 (-0.04%) ...
Monday, 02 February 15
API 4 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP ROSE WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 declined month over month and day on day.
The Q1 swap has decli ...
Monday, 02 February 15
INDONESIA'S ADARO ENERGY PRODUCED 56.21 MILLION TONNES OF COAL IN 2014; UP 8% Y-O-Y
COALspot.com: PT. Adaro Energy, Indonesia’s largest coal producer, has increased coal production by 8% to 56.21 million tonnes (Mt) from both ...
|
|
|
Showing 3216 to 3220 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
|
| |
| |
|
