We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 December 13
INDONESIAN PARLIAMENT REJECTED A GOVERNMENT PROPOSAL TO EASE THE BAN ON EXPORTING UNPROCESSED ORE
COALspot.com: Indonesian House of Representatives rejected a proposal from Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Jero Wacik on to ease the ban on ex ...
Friday, 06 December 13
THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY & MINERAL RESOURCES OF INDONESIA FIXED DEC'13 HBA AT US$ 80.31
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has increased government declared coal bench mark price by US$ 2.18 / MT ...
Friday, 06 December 13
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 82.8 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL IN NOVEMBER 2013
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.00 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 06 December 13
PANAMAXES HAVE BEEN THE ' WEAPON OF CHOICE' BY MOST DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS DURING 2013 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Low ship prices, the direct consequence of subdued freight rates for the larger part of 2013 have been the main driving force behind this year's ag ...
Thursday, 05 December 13
PANAMAX : THE FIRM TENDENCY CONTINUES - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
It has been an active week for the Supramax and Handysize segment. USG is almost boiling and charterers looking to cover their December stems ...
|
|
|
Showing 3971 to 3975 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
