We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 07 January 14
INDONESIA RAISES COAL PRICE THIS MONTH
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has increased government declared coal bench mark price by US$ 1.59 / MT ...
Tuesday, 07 January 14
NEWCASTLE COAL TERMINAL'S COAL EXPORTS SLIDE TO 3.54 MMT W/E 30 DECEMBER 13
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 30, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.54 ...
Tuesday, 07 January 14
US COAL OUTPUT SLIDES 9 PCT WEEK ON WEEK, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 17.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Monday, 06 January 14
ARGUS LAUNCHES SPOT CFR EAST COAST INDIA COAL ASSESSMENTS
COALspot.com: Global energy and commodity news and price reporting agency Argus has announced today that, the company has launched CFR coal assessme ...
Monday, 06 January 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAPS SLIDE TO $ 61.25 FOR Q4' 14 DELIVERY
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery lost $ 0.32 pmt month on month on Friday 3 January 2014. Th ...
|
|
|
Showing 3921 to 3925 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- White Energy Company Limited
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
