We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 14 March 14
US, THE WORLD'S SECOND LARGEST COAL PRODUCER MINED 75.3 MMST OF COAL IN FEBRUARY; DOWN 10.88% M-M
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.7 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 13 March 14
HANDY: THE FAR EAST MARKET IS IN AN UPWARD TREND - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
Atlantic is a bit under pressure for spot tonnage, but the underlying sentiment is positive for the short medium future. 2-3 legs are do ...
Thursday, 13 March 14
MARKET INSIGHT - CHRISTOPHER T. WHITTY
By Christopher T. Whitty
Marketing Manager
Cotzias Intermodal Shipping Inc.
During the last year we have noticed that a fair number of ...
Wednesday, 12 March 14
ADARO ENERGY IMPROVES EFFICIENCY AND GENERATED STRONG EBITDA IN 2013
COALspot.com: PT Adaro Energy Tbk, Indonesia's single largest coal miner posted revenue of US$ 3.28 billion and cost of revenue of US$ 2.54 ...
Wednesday, 12 March 14
DGOMC OF INDONESIA REVISED DOWN THE BENCHMARK PRICES FOR COAL BY 4.26% IN MARCH
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has revised down the government's declared coal bench mark price ...
|
|
|
Showing 3801 to 3805 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
