We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 09 June 14
INDO SUB-BIT COAL SWAPS FOR Q3,Q4 OF 2014 AND Q1 2015: LOST ON DAY AND MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 continue last week’s trend or lost on day, week and on month according to Asia ...
Monday, 09 June 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP Q3 14 DELIVERIES LOST 4.61% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q3 14 deliveries lost 4.61 percent month on month and closed at US$ 71.62 per mt a ...
Sunday, 08 June 14
DRY BULK MARKET RATES FOR PANAMXES TO REMAIN VOLATILE; NO IMPROVEMENTS SEEN OVER THE WEEK
COALspot.com: Cape index increase pushes BDI index to 989 points week on week. The BDI firmed up by 5.88 pct and closed at 989 points week ended 6 ...
Saturday, 07 June 14
EVERYTHING CHANGES, AND NOTHING ABIDES - HERACLITUS
A couple of weeks ago, and while everyone was focusing on the struggling freight market, Russia and China made history by signing a three-decade lo ...
Saturday, 07 June 14
FIRST BITE AT ANTI-CORRUPTION CLAUSE - BIMCO
In recent years a number of countries have introduced anti-corruption legislation which, unfortunately, fails to recognise the practical implicatio ...
|
|
|
Showing 3666 to 3670 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- White Energy Company Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
|
| |
| |
|
