We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 23 June 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAP FOR Q3 DELIVERY LOST 8.60% Y-O-Y;4.80% M-O-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 lost on day, week and on month according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports re ...
Monday, 23 June 14
COAL SWAPS DROPS FURTHER MONTH ON MONTH ON WEAK DEMAND
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q3 14 deliveries lost 6.91 percent month on month and closed at US$ 69.00 per mt a ...
Sunday, 22 June 14
THE PANAMAX COAL FREIGHT FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA SLIPPED THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange's main sea freight index, which tracks rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities, fell slightly on Friday ...
Friday, 20 June 14
DRY BULK MARKET LOOKING FOR UPSIDE ON ROBUST SEABORNE IRON ORE TRADE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market hasn’t been able to justify the heightened expectations this year. Yesterday, the Baltic Dry Index managed to inch forwar ...
Friday, 20 June 14
US WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION DROPS 1.8% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.3 million short tons (mmst) of coal in a ...
|
|
|
Showing 3646 to 3650 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- VISA Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
