We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 02 July 14
THE PANAMAX MARKET CONTINUED TO BLEED FOR ANOTHER WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market succumbed to mounting pressure this past week, while the Capesize market proved unable to “save the day&rdq ...
Wednesday, 02 July 14
HANDY BULKERS PROVE TO BE THE MOST SOUGHT AFTER VESSELS OVER THE PAST WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The Handy dry bulker proved to be the most sought after ship by ship owners active in the second hand market, which saw a slight decline in terms o ...
Wednesday, 02 July 14
SHIPPING: MARKET INSIGHT - GEORGE DERMATIS
After 6 months, 57 ministerial meetings and 67 political agreements, the journey of the Greek Presidency in the EU reached its end yesterday; only ...
Tuesday, 01 July 14
INDIAN POWER PLANT COAL STOCKPILES VERY LOW
COALspot.com: According to today's Weekly Dry Bulk Report published by Commodore Research, Indian power plant coal stockpiles have now fallen t ...
Monday, 30 June 14
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL PRICES ARE STILL STRUGGLING TO RECOVER
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 lost on week and on month according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports release ...
|
|
|
Showing 3631 to 3635 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The University of Queensland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
|
| |
| |
|
