We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 25 March 23
COAL INDIA HAS STRONG CASE TO INCREASE PRICES, TALKS ON: CMD AGRAWAL - BUSINESS STANDARD
Coal India (CIL) Chairman and Managing Director Pramod Agrawal said on Monday there is a “strong case” for increasing coal prices, and ...
Saturday, 25 March 23
ASIAN CRUDE PALM OIL WATCH 1Q23 - FITCH RATINGS
Malaysian benchmark crude palm oil (CPO) spot prices have averaged around USD915 per tonne (t) so far in 1Q23, sharply lower than the average of ar ...
Saturday, 25 March 23
INDONESIA’S COAL EXPORT INCREASED BY 21.0% YOY TO 388.4 MLN T IN 2022 - BANCHERO COSTA
After a slow start in the first quarter, global coal trade has really picked up pace last year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels. In the f ...
Saturday, 25 March 23
GLOBAL LNG-ASIA SPOT PRICES SLIP AS WEAK NORTHERN DEMAND REMAINS - REUTERS
Asian spot prices of liquefied natural gas (LNG) declined this week, falling to a 21-month low, as weak demand in the northeast Asia region continu ...
Wednesday, 22 March 23
OIL PRICE FALL SPECULATIVE, TO HIT $140 BY YEAR-END -ANDURAND: REUTERS
The recent fall in oil prices due to banking jitters is speculative and oil will hit $140 a barrel by the end of the year, hedge fund manager Pierr ...
|
|
|
Showing 116 to 120 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
|
| |
| |
|
