We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 September 24
REBOUND IN OIL DEMAND COULD LIFT MARKET IN LATTER HALF OF 2024 - BIMCO
Supply/demand
Based on a strong second half demand, the supply/balance is forecast to strengthen in 2024 but weaken slightly in 2025 as n ...
Friday, 06 September 24
GLOBAL SEABORNE LNG TRADE HAS CONTINUED TO INCREASE LAST YEAR - BANCHERO COSTA
Global seaborne LNG trade has continued to increase last year, helped also by the events in Ukraine which forced Europe to diversify away from Russ ...
Wednesday, 28 August 24
SEABORNE COAL IMPORTS INTO INDIA INCREASED BY +9.9% Y-O-Y TO 146.6 MLN T - BANCHERO COSTA
Global coal trade has really picked up pace over the past year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels said Banchero Costa Research in its lates ...
Tuesday, 06 August 24
EXERCISE CAUTION WITH AMMONIA SWITCH - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has thrown a spanner into the plan to transition ships from diesel fuel to ammonia ...
Friday, 02 August 24
ENERGY MARKET DEVELOPMENTS: COAL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES REACH RECORD HIGHS - WORLD BANK
The recent surge in natural gas and coal prices has been so swift that the main benchmarks were roughly three times higher in 2022Q2 compared to a ...
|
|
|
Showing 1 to 5 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Planning Commission, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
1 