COALspot.com keeps you connected across the coal world

Submit Your Articles
We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining, shipping, etc.

To Submit your article please click here.

International Energy Events


Search News
Latest CoalNews Headlines
Thursday, 19 December 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE HITS THREE-YEAR HIGH - MOORE STEPHENS


Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for more than three years over the three-month period to November 2013, according to the latest Shipping Confidence Survey from international accountant and shipping adviser Moore Stephens. There was encouraging news on freight rates, and evidence of an increased willingness to invest. But concern persists on overtonnaging, operating costs, and the cost of regulation.

In November 2013, the average confidence level expressed by respondents in the markets in which they operate was 6.1 on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high), compared to the 5.9 recorded in the previous survey in August 2013. This is the highest figure since the 6.2 recorded in August 2010. The survey was launched in May 2008 with a confidence rating of 6.8.

Despite the overall improvement in confidence, owners were the only category of individual respondent to post an increase this time, from 5.8 to 6.2, the highest figure recorded since May 2010. Confidence on the part of managers, however, was down from 6.2 to 6.1, while for charterers there was a drop from 6.3 to 5.7. Geographically, confidence was down in Asia (from 6.1 to 5.9) but up in Europe (from 5.9 to 6.1) and in North America, from 6.0 to 6.6.

The mood of optimism apparent in a number of responses was typified by the respondent who noted: “We clearly see an upswing in the markets when talking to various people at various locations in the last couple of months. There is, for the first time in a long while, a general feeling of optimism. Furthermore, the economic indicators, both small and large, all over the world, are pointing in the direction of recovery. We cannot expect it to reach the same levels as in 2007/2008, but a sustainable level of confidence is much better than skyrocketing markets because the higher you climb the lower you might fall.”

Another respondent pointed out: “The light we see at the end of the tunnel is not, as had been feared, a train coming towards us. We are quietly optimistic, with supply and demand seeming to come into balance, despite concerns over the amount of new orders being placed.”

One respondent emphasised: “A growing global economy, including the US and the EU, is crucial for an improved shipping market, and there are some good signs of that at the moment, which makes us hopeful for the future.” Another remarked, “We envisage the market growing in Asia, and in Brazil and Russia, typified by increasing imports of products for use in energy projects. We also see an increase in the use of gas as an alternative energy source, with many countries developing infrastructure and facilities to facilitate distribution.”

Others were slightly more guarded, such as the respondents who noted: “The shipping market will stay more or less at current levels well into next year as the world economic situation continues to fluctuate,” and, “The shipping industry in general is very weak at present, although we do expect improvements in 2014.” Others still remained pessimistic, such as the respondent who complained, “Shipping companies are facing a number of challenges, including low market rates caused by overtonnaging in a number of sectors, slow growth in the global economy, and increases in global ship operating costs.” Another noted, “Supply remains higher than demand, with significant falls in freight rates, while operating costs are always increasing. All this means that the shipping business is no longer attractive.”

Elsewhere it was noted: “Things are still pretty fragile, and it wouldn’t take much to knock many operators back into the hole again,” and, “We think the industry is stuck where it is for another year as available tonnage waits for an uplift in world trade.”

The overriding concern on the part of respondents once more related to the levels of excess tonnage both in the market and about to enter it. “There is too much shipbuilding capacity which, coupled with the entry of new investors, will lead to a continuation in the current oversupply of tonnage and low rates,” said one respondent. Another noted: “We need to convince owners to stop building ships, especially tankers,” while another observed “There is a large surplus which is unlikely to be removed for two or three years.”

One respondent said: “Our principal concern is the perennial ability of owners to kill off improvements by increasing the supply of vessels in every sector,” while another feared, “The higher average rates we are likely to see in 2014 will be killed off by massive new deliveries in 2015.”  Yet another observed, “Owners must be disciplined when placing new orders, even if they have the luxury of using other people’s money.”

Operating costs and the cost of regulatory compliance continued to concern respondents, one of whom noted “Regulations to control emissions are commendable, and owners will have to adhere to them, but they will need financial support to compensate for the high cost of installing technologically advanced equipment to meet the requirements.” Another pointed out, “Regulatory requirements are still not fully factored into economic assessments, be they financing or investment decisions, and this will come back to haunt the industry.”

“Operating costs and the increasing cost of regulation are major factors,” noted one respondent, “and indeed the cost of additional regulation directly affects operating costs. There is a problem also with the supply of qualified crew, especially in certain niche markets, due to the ‘greying’ of the supply pool.” Another respondent simply said: “Low freight rates, high operating costs and costly regulations are killing us.”

The likelihood of respondents making a major investment or significant development over the next 12 months was up on the previous survey, on a scale of 1 to 10, from 5.5 to 5.8 which, as with overall confidence, is the highest figure recorded since August 2010. The figure for managers was up from 5.8 to its highest ever figure of 6.1, while that for owners was also up, from 5.8 to 6.0. Although charterers recorded a fall, from 6.7 to 6.4, they remain the most optimistic category of respondent in terms of the likelihood of making a new investment.

The number of managers rating the likelihood of making a new investment over the next twelve months at 7.0 out of 10.0, or higher, was up from 45 per cent to 51 per cent, while the number of owners who thought likewise was up by one percentage point from 47 per cent to 48 per cent. The percentage of charterers of like mind, however, was down from 72 per cent to 45 per cent. Geographically, expectation levels of major investments were up in both Asia and Europe, from 5.5 to 5.7 and from 5.6 to 5.8 respectively, and in North America from 5.0 to 5.8.

One respondent said: “While earnings and income are low, there is still a great deal of activity involving planning and preparing for the future, and indeed we are investing with a very positive attitude.” Another noted: “Some major owners have the funds available to acquire tonnage. But the key is timing, and too many big shipping companies are intent on looking good on paper despite the fact that they are actually drowning.”

A number of respondents referred to the increasing involvement in the industry of non-shipping investors. One said: “The risk of overcapacity in all sectors has increased now that so many non-shipping investors have discovered the shipping market”, while another noted “Over the past five years we have seen a lot of non-shipping investors enter the market, and they have now seen that shipping is not an easy business. But we are hopeful for the future, and now is certainly not the time to leave the table.”

Demand trends, competition and finance costs once again featured as the top three factors cited by respondents overall as those likely to influence performance most significantly over the coming twelve months. The overall numbers for demand trends and finance costs were down by one percentage point to 23% and 15 % respectively, while competition was unchanged at 19%. Tonnage supply (unchanged at 13%) featured in fourth place, ahead of fuel costs (static at 10%) and operating costs, another non-mover, at 9%.

Demand trends remained the number one performance-affecting factor for owners, unchanged at 25 %. Tonnage supply, meanwhile, was up one percentage point to 17% in joint-second place with finance costs, up 2 percentage points. For managers, meanwhile, competition was in first place, up 2 percentage points to 22%, the highest figure in the life of the survey. Demand trends, unchanged at 15%, featured in second place ahead of finance costs, down four percentage points to 14%.

For charterers, demand trends, although down by 7 percentage points to 26%, featured in first place, ahead of competition (up 2 percentage points to 22%), and tonnage supply, unchanged at 16%.

Geographically, demand trends were the most significant factor for respondents in Asia (up by one percentage point to 24%), Europe (down to 22% from 24%) and North America (up by 3 percentage points to 35%, the highest figure recorded since the survey was launched). Competition and finance costs, in that order, made up the top three performance-affecting factors in both Asia and Europe, while in North America it was competition and tonnage supply.

There was a one percentage-point fall (from 41% to 40%) in the number of respondents overall who expected finance costs to increase over the next 12 months. The number of respondents expecting finance costs to come down, meanwhile, fell by two percentage points to 9%, which was nevertheless still the second-highest figure recorded in this regard since August 2011. Owners were the only main category to record an increase in the numbers of respondents expecting higher finance costs (up from 36% to 41%).  The figure for brokers was down from 50% to 36%, while both managers (down from 44% to 40%) and charterers (down ten percentage points to 28%) recorded all-time survey lows in this respect.

The number of respondents in Asia anticipating an increase in the cost of finance fell by 4 percentage points to 49%, while in Europe the numbers were up from 33% to 35%. In North America, meanwhile, the numbers anticipating higher finance costs fell sharply from 57% to 33%.

One respondent said: “Financing is a big problem”, while another noted, “It is difficult to finance new projects, given unsatisfactory returns on investment and perceived risk levels on the part of banks.”

Turning to the freight markets, there was, for the second survey in succession, an increased expectation of higher rates in the tanker and dry bulk sectors. One respondent claimed, “Rates have not reached this level since October 2008.” In the container ship market, meanwhile, confidence was maintained at existing levels.

The number of respondents overall who expressed an expectation of higher rates in the tanker sector over the next twelve months was up by 5 percentage points to 43%, the highest figure since May 2011. Owners led the way, with 52% anticipating higher rates, as opposed to 37% last time. Managers’ expectations in this regard were up by one percentage point to 37%, but 40% of brokers (as opposed to 35%) thought that tanker rates were likely to go up over the coming year. Charterers, however, were of a different mind, with the number anticipating higher tanker rates falling from 43% to 36%.

Geographically, the prospects for increased tanker rates were deemed higher this time by respondents in Asia (up from 39% to 46%), in Europe (up from 36% to 40%) and in North America (up by 40 percentage points to 83%).

In the dry bulk sector, meanwhile, there was a 14 percentage-point increase, to 56%, in the overall numbers of those anticipating rate increases. This is the highest figure recorded in the life of the survey, and 100% up on the corresponding figure when the survey was launched in 2008. Managers, up by 22 percentage points to a survey high of 60%, led the way, followed by owners, up 6 percentage points to 58%, another all-time high. Even charterers, recording a 5 percentage-point increase to 47%, and brokers (up by 25 percentage points to 46%) were looking on the bright side.

Expectations of higher dry bulk rates over the next 12 months were up to all-time survey highs in both Asia and Europe, rising by 21% and 13% respectively to levels of 63% and 55%. The numbers were also up, by 8 percentage points to 64%, in North America.

One respondent said: “The dry cargo market is coming into balance and, with the new eco-ships on the way, everything looks very positive for those owners who have the right fleet profile and minimal counter-party risk.” Elsewhere, however, it was noted, “Strong dry bulk markets can only last for a very short time, making it difficult to compensate for the poor market conditions we have seen in recent years.”

In the container ship market, the numbers expecting rates to increase over the coming 12 months was unchanged at 30%. Owners’ expectations were up by 3 percentage points on last time to 30%, while optimism in this regard on the part of brokers rose from 25% to 29%.  The expectations of managers rose two percentage points to 30 per cent, while those of charterers held steady, also at 30%. Geographically, expectations of improved container ship rates were up by 3 percentage points in Asia to 36%, by 9 percentage points in North America to 44%, and unchanged in Europe at 27%.

One respondent made the extravagant claim that, “All non-operator-owned container ships need to be removed from the market, so that over-supply can be corrected.”

Moore Stephens Shipping Partner, Richard Greiner, said: “The findings of this latest survey provide more good news for the shipping industry. It is now fifteen months since we recorded a decline in shipping confidence. There is an old adage which says that confidence is contagious. If that is true, shipping certainly seems to have caught the bug.

“It was noticeable on this occasion that, in contrast to previous surveys, very few of our respondents referred to the effect that the global economic and political situation is having on their business. This does not mean, of course, that those problems have gone away. But it is a clear indication that they are perceived to be improving, to the extent that the industry is now focusing on issues closer to home, and moreover on problems where they can realistically contribute towards helping to find a solution.

“Those problems represent a significant challenge for the shipping industry. Moreover, they continue to have a familiar ring to them. There are still too many ships for the cargoes available on many trades. There is not the ready access to bank finance that many would like. Operating costs are expected to rise over the next two years, following the fall for 2012 recorded by Moore Stephens’ ship operating costs benchmark study OpCost. Crew wages are only moving in one direction. The cost of keeping up with regulatory compliance is now a big-ticket item. And P&I premiums are on the increase.

“These problems will not go away. But the prospect of being able to fund them properly is brighter now than for some time. Expectations of improved rates in the dry bulk sector are now higher than at any time in the last five years, while in the tanker market the mood is at its most bullish for two and a half years. In the container trades, things are meanwhile holding up well. In short, there should be more money about next year, although no shortage of things to spend it on.

“Some of that money will have to be spent on compliance and on increased operating costs, but there could be some over for new investment, expectations of which are running at their highest survey levels for two and a half years. That is good news, particularly when viewed together with indications of the increasing interest being shown in shipping by non-industry investors. The latter, of course, can bring problems of its own, but in principle the prospect of new money coming into shipping should be a good thing.

“Whatever the level of new money coming in, the vast majority of players who have survived the downturn of the past five years are very much old money in terms of their industry experience. They have taken the worst that can be thrown at them and are still standing. That means that they have committed to operating in a cleaner and leaner shipping industry, and to meeting the costs that go with it. Provided the evidence of improved confidence that we are seeing does not turn out to be a false dawn, they can reasonably expect to reap better rewards over the coming years than they have for some time.”
Source: Moore Stephens / Hellenic Shipping News



If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.

Recent News

Sunday, 22 December 13
QUIET FREIGHT MARKET DUE TO LONG HOLIDAYS
COALspot.com: The market was soft this week with all indices down. However towards second half of the week the futures on segments was firming up. ...


Friday, 20 December 13
US PRODUCED 2.71% MORE COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...


Friday, 20 December 13
DRY BULK MARKET SLUMPS AHEAD OF HOLIDAY SEASON - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As has been the case in recent years, the dry bulk market has been on a downward trend ahead of the Holiday Season for a large part of the world. Th ...


Wednesday, 18 December 13
SNP ACTIVITY IN CHINA SEEMS TO BE SLOWING DOWN - CHRISTOS TRAGEAS
Approaching the end of the year, SnP activity in China seems to be slowing down in comparison to the first half of this quarter, as most Chinese Shi ...


Wednesday, 18 December 13
DEMOLITION ACTIVITY SCALED BACK AS FREIGHT RATES RISE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
It's always been the case that each time we witness a spike in freight rates, demolition activity is decreasing, as owners are looking for more car ...


   788 789 790 791 792   
Showing 3946 to 3950 news of total 6871
News by Category
Popular News
 
Total Members : 28,616
Member
Panelist
User ID
Password
Remember Me
By logging on you accept our TERMS OF USE.
Free
Register
Forgot Password
 
Our Members Are From ...

  • BNP Paribas - Singapore
  • Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
  • Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
  • Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
  • Permata Bank - Indonesia
  • Indian Energy Exchange, India
  • The University of Queensland
  • GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
  • U S Energy Resources
  • GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
  • Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
  • Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
  • TANGEDCO India
  • CESC Limited - India
  • Britmindo - Indonesia
  • Coal India Limited
  • Russian Coal LLC
  • Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
  • Rudhra Energy - India
  • McKinsey & Co - India
  • MEC Coal - Indonesia
  • Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
  • Anglo American - United Kingdom
  • Maybank - Singapore
  • Arch Coal - USA
  • Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
  • Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
  • Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
  • ANZ Bank - Australia
  • KPCL - India
  • Total Coal South Africa
  • PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
  • PowerSource Philippines DevCo
  • Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
  • Adaro Indonesia
  • Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
  • CNBM International Corporation - China
  • CCIC - Indonesia
  • Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
  • Sucofindo - Indonesia
  • Vedanta Resources Plc - India
  • IOL Indonesia
  • Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
  • EIA - United States
  • Adani Power Ltd - India
  • Coeclerici Indonesia
  • Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
  • Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
  • McConnell Dowell - Australia
  • GNFC Limited - India
  • Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
  • SUEK AG - Indonesia
  • Arutmin Indonesia
  • Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
  • Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
  • Mechel - Russia
  • Aditya Birla Group - India
  • Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
  • Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
  • Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
  • International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
  • ACC Limited - India
  • Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
  • CoalTek, United States
  • Indonesian Coal Mining Association
  • Bank of America
  • The Treasury - Australian Government
  • Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
  • Mjunction Services Limited - India
  • Moodys - Singapore
  • PLN - Indonesia
  • Bhatia International Limited - India
  • NALCO India
  • Ministry of Transport, Egypt
  • Maruti Cements - India
  • UOB Asia (HK) Ltd
  • Inco-Indonesia
  • IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
  • Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
  • KEPCO - South Korea
  • Bangkok Bank PCL
  • Wilmar Investment Holdings
  • Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
  • Deloitte Consulting - India
  • Asia Cement - Taiwan
  • Jatenergy - Australia
  • Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
  • Ince & co LLP
  • Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
  • Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
  • Infraline Energy - India
  • Coaltrans Conferences
  • Shenhua Group - China
  • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
  • Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
  • Cemex - Philippines
  • Vitol - Bahrain
  • Thailand Anthracite
  • Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
  • Inspectorate - India
  • Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
  • Ministry of Mines - Canada
  • Videocon Industries ltd - India
  • Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
  • Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
  • HSBC - Hong Kong
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Romanian Commodities Exchange
  • Clarksons - UK
  • Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
  • Indian Oil Corporation Limited
  • Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
  • PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
  • Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
  • BRS Brokers - Singapore
  • Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
  • Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
  • New Zealand Coal & Carbon
  • TNPL - India
  • Peabody Energy - USA
  • Cosco
  • Independent Power Producers Association of India
  • Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
  • UBS Singapore
  • Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
  • Goldman Sachs - Singapore
  • Barclays Capital - USA
  • Tanito Harum - Indonesia
  • SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
  • Australian Coal Association
  • Argus Media - Singapore
  • Parry Sugars Refinery, India
  • Mitsui
  • Minerals Council of Australia
  • Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
  • Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
  • Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
  • Mitra SK Pvt Ltd - India
  • Enel Italy
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
  • SGS (Thailand) Limited
  • South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
  • Shree Cement - India
  • Noble Europe Ltd - UK
  • Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
  • Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
  • Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
  • Tata Power - India
  • Mitsubishi Corporation
  • Surastha Cement
  • Dalmia Cement Bharat India
  • IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
  • Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
  • Malco - India
  • Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
  • Qatrana Cement - Jordan
  • Credit Suisse - India
  • Indika Energy - Indonesia
  • Marubeni Corporation - India
  • GMR Energy Limited - India
  • Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
  • Gresik Semen - Indonesia
  • European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
  • CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
  • ING Bank NV - Singapore
  • JPMorgan - India
  • Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
  • Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
  • JPower - Japan
  • Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
  • TRAFIGURA, South Korea
  • Indonesia Power. PT
  • ICICI Bank Limited - India
  • Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
  • DBS Bank - Singapore
  • Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • bp singapore
  • Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
  • Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
  • Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
  • Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
  • Economic Council, Georgia
  • Pinang Coal Indonesia
  • Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
  • Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
  • Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
  • World Coal - UK
  • Cement Manufacturers Association - India
  • Planning Commission, India
  • Bangladesh Power Developement Board
  • TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
  • Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
  • Parliament of New Zealand
  • Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
  • Latin American Coal - Colombia
  • Kobe Steel Ltd - Japan
  • Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
  • Bhushan Steel Limited - India
  • AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
  • Panama Canal Authority
  • Idemitsu - Japan
  • White Energy Company Limited
  • Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
  • Renaissance Capital - South Africa
  • TGV SRAAC LIMITED, India
  • Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
  • Fearnleys - India
  • Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
  • Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
  • Malabar Cements Ltd - India
  • ETA - Dubai
  • Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
  • Central Electricity Authority - India
  • Mercator Lines Limited - India
  • GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
  • IBC Asia (S) Pte Ltd
  • OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
  • Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
  • EMO - The Netherlands
  • Thermax Limited - India
  • OCBC - Singapore
  • Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
  • Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
  • Carbofer General Trading SA - India
  • J M Baxi & Co - India
  • KPMG - USA
  • Posco Energy - South Korea
  • Commonwealth Bank - Australia
  • Singapore Mercantile Exchange
  • Platou - Singapore
  • Star Paper Mills Limited - India
  • Baramulti Group, Indonesia
  • Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
  • Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
  • Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
  • PLN Batubara - Indonesia
  • Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
  • globalCOAL - UK
  • Coal and Oil Company - UAE
  • Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
  • Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
  • ASAPP Information Group - India
  • India Bulls Power Limited - India
  • Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
  • Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
  • PTC India Limited - India
  • Freeport Indonesia
  • Deutsche Bank - India
  • Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
  • APGENCO India
  • Sojitz Corporation - Japan
  • Petron Corporation, Philippines
  • Thriveni
  • World Bank
  • Interocean Group of Companies - India
  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa
  • Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
  • Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
  • Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
  • Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
  • Central Java Power - Indonesia
  • Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
  • The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
  • Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
  • Thomson Reuters GRC
  • Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
  • Samsung - South Korea
  • Gupta Coal India Ltd
  • MS Steel International - UAE
  • Tamil Nadu electricity Board
  • Berau Coal - Indonesia
  • Eastern Coal Council - USA
  • Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
  • Maersk Broker
  • LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
  • SMG Consultants - Indonesia
  • The India Cements Ltd
  • Indogreen Group - Indonesia
  • Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
  • Thiess Contractors Indonesia
  • Geoservices-GeoAssay Lab
  • Siam City Cement - Thailand
  • Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
  • RBS Sempra - UK
  • Glencore India Pvt. Ltd
  • GHCL Limited - India
  • Indorama - Singapore
  • Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
  • Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
  • Coal Orbis AG
  • Cargill India Pvt Ltd
  • Trasteel International SA, Italy
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Energy Development Corp, Philippines
  • Heidelberg Cement - Germany
  • Electricity Authority, New Zealand
  • Lafarge - France
  • Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Vale Mozambique
  • SASOL - South Africa
  • Eastern Energy - Thailand
  • Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
  • Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
  • Xstrata Coal
  • Agrawal Coal Company - India
  • Xindia Steels Limited - India
  • London Commodity Brokers - England
  • Core Mineral Indonesia
  • PetroVietnam
  • Cardiff University - UK
  • Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
  • Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
  • SMC Global Power, Philippines
  • Japan Coal Energy Center
  • Petrosea - Indonesia
  • Humpuss - Indonesia
  • Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
  • Merrill Lynch Bank
  • Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
  • Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
  • Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
  • Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
  • Sical Logistics Limited - India
  • Edison Trading Spa - Italy
  • Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
  • Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
  • Reliance Power - India
  • Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
  • Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
  • Bank of China, Malaysia
  • WorleyParsons
  • Platts
  • KOWEPO - South Korea
  • SRK Consulting
  • Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
  • Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
  • Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
  • Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
  • San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
  • Georgia Ports Authority, United States
  • Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
  • NTPC Limited - India
  • Medco Energi Mining Internasional
  • GB Group - China
  • Cebu Energy, Philippines
  • VISA Power Limited - India
  • Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
  • IMC Shipping - Singapore
  • Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
  • Thai Mozambique Logistica
  • Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
  • Runge Indonesia